I read an article by Peter Kafta discussing a possible pullback of content resale to Netflix from top content companies, and followed it by an article by Michelle Clancy about how the cable companies will only benefit from Apple and others for cable broadband service growth. At TVOT last summer a further connecting viewpoint was made by Jennifer Mirgorod, Turner EVP of Brand Distribution, suggesting that Turner had been positioning their contracts for content long ago to avoid exclusivity so they could put their content in front of as many viable eyes possible.
The TV environment is changing at a fast pace. Cable Operator third quarter announcements highlighted that they had net gains in cable subscriptions, a hopeful trend away from losses, but if you looked at the numbers, the gains were a tiny fraction compared to their gains in broadband subscriptions. As Michelle pointed out, while the monthly broadband subscription dollar amount is significantly lower, the margins are much higher.
So it would seem that if the MSO's growth business is in their smart pipe to the home, they might prefer that content owners continue to sell to multiple outlets putting demand on the pipe and driving a desire from consumers to increase the bandwidth to the home. Will this shift in revenue change how MSO's contract for content? This is a conundrum for the MSO's as they strive to reinvigorate their video business against a consumption spectrum of video content options that multiply every year (reflected by the ever changing list of services on my smart TV).
From the content creator/owner point of view, I am not so sure they will abandon outlets, as Ms. Mirgorad makes a good point. The higher potential eyes the more opportunities for brand building and ad dollars (aside from paid non-ad services and blocker software). So this may be more about the details in the contracts, than outright cancelation. Netflix is fast becoming the service that can most readily distribute content to a huge global audience, so I don't see them losing much steam. Their content pool will be more localized and diversified beyond the major US studios as they supply content to a multi-lingual and multi-cultural world.
The future for the Cable companies is fascinating right now. With a variety of approaches to attract millenials and cord-cutters; from MCN acquisitions (on-line Multi-Channel Networks), to skinny bundles, to delivering on consumer devices and more, operators are making every attempt to shore up the video business. It will be interesting to see what works best, but either way it looks like the cable companies will win on the other end with their expanding broadband business.
Monday, November 9, 2015
Monday, November 2, 2015
Securing UHD Content
If pay-TV is bringing high-value, proprietary sports content
to 4K, is the threat of piracy far behind?
Rogers’ Communications’ recent announcement
that it would offer a total of 100 baseball and hockey games in 4K next year,
BT’s planned launch of a 4K sports
channel and deployment
of 4K STBs by forward-thinking operators such as Videotron all are signs of
a growing recognition of the value of both the technology and the display
enhancements enabled by its High Dynamic Range (HDR).
But as operators move the needle on content, what’s equally
important is protecting that premium programming with stronger Conditional
Access Systems (CAS). While the 64-bit
systems in use by most operators today is sufficient for current needs, better
choices for securing higher-value 4K content -- now and in the future -- would
be the 128-bit or 256-bit versions of the Advanced Encryption Standards (AES).
The coming availability of live sports can give pay-TV a
competitive edge in countering early moves by Amazon, Netflix and over-the-top
providers to leverage the growth
of 4K. You can read more here about the measures the industry can take to ensure that its
investments in 4K production and delivery are protected as it brings that
content to market.
Friday, October 30, 2015
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Android in the Pay-TV Market
The growing footprint of Android in mobile devices has two implications for pay-TV operators: the development of an enormous Android ecosystem that can create and support applications, as well as the increased availability of smartphone semiconductors. In this video, John Carlucci, President and CTO of Alticast US, discusses how the pay-TV industry can expedite availability of advanced services by pulling Android technology, tools and applications into the television space.
Monday, October 5, 2015
Alticast on IoT
At last months IBC show, Alticast's Tiaan Schutte, President, EMEA, spoke with Advanced TV on the Smart Home and Internet of Things. To watch the video, click here:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




